Homepage
Barricades (10)
Channelizer (5)
Traffic Cones (10)
Traffic Signals (2)
Traffic Signs (492)
8 Aug 2008, 14:26

As traffic volumes increase on and around school sites during drop-off and pick-up periods, so do the number of potential conflicts between vehicles and pedestrians. When different transportation modes compete for the same space, coupled with inadequate traffic control and supervision, an unsafe environment can result.
Many existing school driveways and parking lots were not designed to handle the large numbers of vehicles picking up and dropping off students, in terms of circulation or parking. In addition, many urban schools (built before 1980) do not have driveways or parking lots to use for pick-up and drop-off. As a result, the adjacent streets are lined with parked vehicles.
Many of the observations and solutions for on-site problems also apply to the on-street issues observed. Providing consistent and visible traffic control on the streets adjacent to schools presumably will aid pedestrians and drivers as they enter a school zone. More visible school zones also can be obtained by maintaining School signs, sidewalks and crosswalk pavement markings; using high-visibility signing; the presence of adult monitors and crossing guards; and other traffic calming features.
Signing and pavement markings should be maintained on a regular basis (at least once per year) and, preferably, school zone signing and pavement markings should be checked at the beginning of the school year and periodically thereafter to ensure that they are in good condition in all environments (day, night, wet).
Reduced speeds near schools are fairly standard; however, drivers do not always observe speed limits. Providing supplemental signing in a school zone may offer an additional reminder to drivers to slow down. Real-time speed radar signs that flash vehicle speeds are becoming more popular in school zones, as well as "Fines Double in School Zones" signs.
Pedestrian countdown timers at signalized intersections and mid-block crossings are seen as a benefit to students because they gauge whether they have enough time to cross the street. Trained adult crossing guards also provide students additional assistance when crossing busy streets.
CONClUSION
The number of students arriving and departing from school in passenger vehicles has increased to approximately 50 percent, up from 12 percent three decades ago. Both on-site and on-street traffic and safety problems are occurring as a result of this shift in transportation modes. Communication among schools, parents, cities, law enforcement and students about behavior expectations in school zones is critical to success and safety in school zones.
Safety problems most frequently observed included students crossing at unmarked crosswalks, students unloading and loading on the street side, all transportation modes (bus, pedestrians, vehicles) sharing the same space and traffic violations. In addition to these student and driver behaviors, many schools did not have structured arrival or dismissal procedures in place and did not have a school transportation safety committee established to assist with problems before and after school.
Be sure to take advantage of the Safe Routes To School funding program being offered to all municipalities by the Federal government, and learn how your school can benefit from this incredible program and how
Federal Funding for School Zones
http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/saferoutes/srtsguidance.htm
State Routes To Schools Funding
http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/saferoutes/fy09projection.htm
Pedestrian Crosswalks - How Safe Are They?
31 Jul 2008, 15:51

The Department of Transportation's crosswalk policy is based on research conducted over a seven-year period with U.S. Barricades and U.S. Traffic Sign
Overall, the question of crosswalks is a difficult one and there are no easy answers. The following discussion surveys some of the factors which enter into traffic engineers' decisions to mark crosswalks and are offered here in the interest of broader public understanding.
Marked crosswalks are widely classified as safety devices and most jurisdictions give the pedestrian the right-of-way when within them. Interestingly, however, there is strong evidence that these very facts prompt many pedestrians to feel overly secure when using a marked crosswalk - to the degree that they may aggressively place themselves in a hazardous position with respect to vehicles in the mistaken belief that the vehicle can and will stop in all cases, even when it may be impossible to do so. It is not unusual, also, for this type of pedestrian behavior to cause rear-end collisions.
By contrast, a pedestrian using an unmarked crosswalk generally feels less secure, less certain that the vehicle will stop - and exercises more caution in waiting for safe gaps in traffic before crossing. The end result is fewer accidents at unmarked crosswalks.
One of the commonly accepted functions of the marked crosswalk is that it serves as a warning device to the traveling public.
And yet, studies show that the driver's view of a crosswalk is greatly reduced at the safe stopping sight distance - where he should be able to perceive and react to a pedestrian in a crosswalk - due to the effects of foreshortening and distance diminishment. The view of the crosswalk is further affected by road alignment, irregularities in the pavement and other variables like weather, a dirty windshield, glare, and adverse lighting conditions.
Meanwhile, the pedestrian's view of the same crosswalk is quite impressive and he's prone to assume that, since he can see the crosswalk so well,certainly the driver can see it just as effectively. This resulting overconfidence is seen as another factor in the disproportionate share of accidents in marked crosswalks.
Assume that for every pedestrian who crosses a street in a marked crosswalk there are some 70 vehicles that drive over it. This is a ratio of use only - obviously each pedestrian does not encounter 70 vehicles. The pedestrian may have only encountered a few, if any, vehicles. Similarly, few, if any of the 70 drivers may have had to slow down or stop for the pedestrian.
In many locations on our roads and streets, the pedestrian and the driver most often encounter marked crosswalks with no necessity to slow down or stop. The result of this relatively low incidence of actual exposure is that it tends to precondition both the pedestrian and the driver to a presumption of safe passage and they are ill-prepared to react when danger does occur.
Does this mean marked crosswalks should not be installed?
Not necessarily. The marked crosswalk is a useful traffic engineering device for channelizing pedestrians and helping pedestrians find their way across complex and confusing intersections. it will continue to be used until a better means is developed to show the preferred route to pedestrians when crossing the street.
The answer, of course, is the understanding by pedestrians that as much caution needs to be used when using a marked crosswalk as those unmarked - which is the purpose of this brief discussion.
The decision to install or not install a marked crosswalk should not be taken lightly. Rational warrants have been adopted in "
In general, marked crosswalks have the following advantages and disadvantages:
A) Advantages
B) Disadvantages
Unjustified and poorly located marked crosswalks may cause an increased expense to the taxpayers for installation and maintenance costs which may not be justified in terms of improved public safety. Indeed, such crosswalks may tend to increase the hazard to pedestrians and drivers alike.
In conclusion, it is appropriate to restate that marked crosswalks will continue to be a useful traffic control device. But, it is important that the general public recognize what marked crosswalks can and cannot do. It is also important that public officials not install them, unless the anticipated benefits clearly outweigh their associated risks.
|
|
|
31 Jul 2008, 15:25


© Copyright 1995-2008 All Rights Reserved
U.S. Barricades & U.S. Traffic Sign
